Audi 80 1989 vs Volvo S40 2004

 
Audi 80
1989 - 1991
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 90 HP125 HP
Torque: 142 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 195 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway1080 km on highway
730 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi CoupeInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo C30
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi 80 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv