Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1991
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 54 - 140 HP100 - 220 HP
Torque: 100 - 181 NM150 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 22 seconds6.8 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 11.54.9 - 10.0
Audi 80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Audi 80 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 81 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`538~ 1`928
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv