Volvo XC40 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC40 engine produces 32 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC40 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC40 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC40 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1447 litres | |
|
Volvo XC40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC40 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |