Volvo XC40 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo XC40) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Qashqai) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC40 engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC40 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Volvo XC40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC40 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC40 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1447 litres | |
|
Volvo XC40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC40 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |