Volvo XC40 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 408 HP | 140 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 660 NM | 240 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 10.4 seconds | 9.2 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.1 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Volvo XC40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC40 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1336 litres | 1447 litres | |
| Volvo XC40 has 19 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC40 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Volvo XC40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`282 | ~ 1`974 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC40 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |