Volvo V90 1997 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V90 engine produces 27 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.8 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V90 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo V90 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |