Volvo V60 2013 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 53 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V60 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V60 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1580 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is larger. Volvo V60 and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1504 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Volvo V60 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volvo V60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`932 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |