Volvo C70 1999 vs Audi TT 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 68 cm longer than the Audi TT, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 262 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 42 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Audi TT has
| |