Volvo C70 2006 vs Volvo S40 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo C70 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S40 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 230 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 350 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 6.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.8 | 4.9 - 10.0 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 204 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 479 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 1`928 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S40 has
| |