Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2015
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Scirocco could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is smaller. Volkswagen Scirocco is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 312 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1006 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 183 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Scirocco has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Scirocco, so Volkswagen Scirocco quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |