Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo S60 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1810 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo S60 2015 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo S60 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1152 litres | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 597 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 2`060 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`501 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 539 kg | 455 kg | |
| Volkswagen Passat load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |