Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo S60 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 254 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 132 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Volkswagen Passat 2014 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat and Volvo S60 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 442 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat has 144 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Volvo S60 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 800 | 29 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |