Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo S60 2015

 
Volkswagen Passat
2014 - 2019
Volvo S60
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP152 HP
Torque: 200 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.8
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1430 km on highway1390 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat 2014 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.87 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Passat is 14 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 586 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1152 litres1749 litres
Volkswagen Passat has 206 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 597 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight: 1`910 kg2`110 kg
Net weight:1`367 kg1`550 kg
Load capacity:543 kg560 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 2009000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv