Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 vs BMW X1 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 64 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Tiguan engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Used also on BMW 1 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.55 m | |
Volkswagen Tiguan is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 50 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X1. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7600 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
BMW X1 has
| |