Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 1029 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3200 litres | 2410 litres | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has 469 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 790 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`159 kg | 2`045 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`408 kg | 1`458 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 751 kg | 587 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caddy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Volkswagen Caddy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |