Toyota Verso 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 4 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 178 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 484 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1696 litres | 1470 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 102 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |