Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Dacia Duster 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Dacia Duster is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 15 HP less power than Dacia Duster, but torque is 57 NM more than Dacia Duster. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.5 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 39 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 475 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1604 litres | |
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 161 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`710 | |
Safety: | |||
Dacia Duster is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |