Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Honda Stream 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 158 HP | |
Torque: | 178 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Toyota Picnic engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Honda Stream. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda Stream 2001: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Picnic is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Picnic is 3 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 158 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 180 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1520 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 320 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`845 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Honda Stream has
| |