Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Land Rover Discovery 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 67 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 19 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |