Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 61 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Ford Ranger. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.8 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 14 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.2 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 3`020 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |