Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC60) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 114 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 126 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 479 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |