Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 95 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 126 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 479 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |