Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 19 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Hilux. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 48 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 900 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Hilux has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 279 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |