Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 387 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 92 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 16.0 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 483 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |