Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 387 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 4 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.4 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Tundra | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 161 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |