Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 387 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser 2012, but torque is 263 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser 2012. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Tundra | Used also on Lexus LX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 is 17 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2012, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 259 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 has 362 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2012. The Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |