Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 387 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.6 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 231 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota 4-Runner can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Tundra | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 574 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |