Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 23 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 640 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space (by 40 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 687 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |