Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 145 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |