Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 23 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 9 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Land Cruiser has 425 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 640 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |