Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 70 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 142 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |