Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Toyota Hilux. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Hilux engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Hilux might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 48 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 900 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Hilux has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 260 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |