Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 81 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |