Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 115 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 144 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 39 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |