Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 68 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |