Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 3 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 650 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 132 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 500 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 31 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |