Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 141 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 194 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 10.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 126 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |