Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 84 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 324 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 750 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 161 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |