Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 122 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 154 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 11.9 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 126 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |