Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.2 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 621 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |