Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 1.8 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 381 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 650 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Land Cruiser are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota RAV4. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.8 | 7.1 - 9.8 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 6.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 226 - 230 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches) | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 72 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 23 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2345 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`322 kg | ~ 1`836 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`538 kg | ~ 1`376 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 784 kg | ~ 460 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 54 600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |