Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2017 -
Toyota Land Cruiser
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.7 - 4.02.7 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 163 - 249 HP163 - 282 HP
Torque: 246 - 450 NM246 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 - 12.7 seconds9.2 - 13.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4 - 11.77.4 - 12.5
Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser 2013. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.78 m
Width: 1.86 m1.89 m
Height: 1.85 m1.85 m
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 621 litres640 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1934 litres
Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 has 19 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2013.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`916~ 2`928
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 53 80028 000
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv