Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 2.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 163 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 320 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 8.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Land Cruiser has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |