Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 145 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 479 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |