Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2013 - 2017
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.7 - 4.03.0 - 3.8

Performance

Power: 163 - 282 HP165 - 250 HP
Torque: 246 - 450 NM261 - 441 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 13.8 seconds10.2 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4 - 12.58.7 - 13.5
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.90 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.85 m1.87 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 640 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1934 litres1790 litres
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Land Cruiser has 425 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 144 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`928~ 3`024
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 28 00011 800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv