Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 3.0 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 261 - 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 10.2 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 8.7 - 13.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 144 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`928 kg | ~ 3`024 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`120 kg | ~ 2`278 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 808 kg | ~ 746 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |