Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Mazda 6 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 120 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 5.2 - 8.0 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 41 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 1702 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 130 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |