Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2013 - 2017
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.7 - 4.02.7 - 4.7

Performance

Power: 163 - 282 HP140 - 258 HP
Torque: 246 - 450 NM295 - 425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 13.8 seconds8.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.4 - 12.59.7 - 16.5
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 220 mm (8.7 inches)210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.61 m
Width: 1.89 m1.85 m
Height: 1.85 m1.79 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 640 litres1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1934 litres2047 litres
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 464 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 113 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`928~ 2`447
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 27 8003400
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv