Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 464 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |