Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Amarok can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 122 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 300 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 7.2 - 9.6 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Amarok. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Land Cruiser can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 47 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |