Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota 4-Runner is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota 4-Runner also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 4.0 - 4.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 555 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 116 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |