Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Land Rover Defender 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Toyota Land Cruiser is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 360 - 361 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 12.5 | 11.1 | |
|
On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser and Land Rover Defender are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 4310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1934 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 3670 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Defender. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`928 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |